Wednesday, May 26, 2010

crime season in the hood

Incident # 10-103382 Type : Break and Enter
HIGH ST, WATERLOO
Between May 21, 2010 to May 23, 2010 Waterloo Regional Police responded to numerous break and enter incidents in and around the vicinity of the universities.

A significant number of these incidents involved student residences and occurred overnight. During these incidents, the suspects took purses/wallets, lap top computers, digital cameras, video game systems and other electronic items.

Police continue to investigate and request anyone with information to contact the Break and Enter Enforcement Team (BEET) at 519 650 8500 ext. 3330/3306.

Sunday, May 23, 2010

More crime

Driver charged, man stabbed, pedestrians hurt in Waterloo melee

May 23, 2010

WATERLOO — A man was stabbed in the back and three men were struck by a car during a wild altercation on a Waterloo street early Saturday morning.

It happened just after 3 a.m. on Lester Street, between Seagram Drive and University Avenue West. Waterloo Regional Police allege a driver drove his car at three men, striking them.

The victims were treated at hospital and later released. The driver, an 18-year-old male from Brampton, is charged with three counts of criminal negligence causing bodily harm, and also dangerous operation of a motor vehicle.

A 20-year-old man was stabbed in the back during the melee, police say. Injuries were minor.

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

another letter to the editor re: behaviour

Hold university students to a high standard

Re: Trapped on Albert — May 1

Students at Waterloo’s two universities should be held to the highest of standards. Granting exemptions to noise bylaws (“party exemptions”) would mean that Waterloo is lowering its expectations of students.

Students, like any other member of the community, should be respected enough for the assumption to be made that they are capable of abiding by Waterloo’s bylaws. Failure to enforce these bylaws should be seen as an insult to the intelligence of our community’s students who are more than capable of following the city’s restrictions.

Waterloo must not lower its expectations of students. This is not fair to the community; nor is this fair to the student.

R.W.

Waterloo

Monday, May 10, 2010

This is the door knocker program going around in the Northdale Neighbourhood. Yes the three girls were dressed like this but a little more on top because of the cold. Now what has more appeal to the student population, this or the door knocker program that the city had done in the past. By the way they seem to have skipped the permanent residents houses. Amazing how they can pick out the student rentals. If you went to this neighbourhood and were to hand out these door hangers, how could you tell permanent vs student occupied residences? Lets hear your responses.

Saturday, May 8, 2010

Letter to the editor - thank you Judy Pearce.

May 08, 2010

Re: Trapped on Albert — May 1

My heart goes out to Deb Easson and Christine Carmody who live on Albert Street in Waterloo, where university students are causing problems.

To the students who resent being stuck with five $300 excessive noise tickets, I’d like to suggest a good start to their university education is learning that if they choose to break the rules, they pay the consequences.

As for student Jackie Dobson, “who didn’t know the rules until they were broken,” am I to assume, when living in her parents’ home she had parties with hundreds of guests who left vomit, broken glass and urine on the neighbours’ lawns, shouted all night, set off fireworks, built bonfires using wood from nearby fences, and tossed cable boxes through windows? Did her parents not mention this behaviour was wrong? Did her neighbours tolerate it?

To student John Bagby, I would like to say the money he has invested in his education that generates huge economic benefits for the community does not buy him the right to cause distress, sleeplessness, fear, anxiety and utter frustration to the people who are forced to live near you.

Here is a possible solution to Easson and Carmody’s dilemma. How about Waterloo Mayor Brenda Halloran and Waterloo regional police Chief Matt Torigian purchase and live in their homes. Let’s wait and see how long it takes before Torigian no longer feels “the last thing we want to do is quell a young student’s memories of university by not having them enjoy their university life.”

We’ll see how many sleepless nights and how much property damage Halloran tolerates before she admits more bylaw officers are needed and more policing needs to be done to stop this insanity.

Judy Pearce

Kitchener

Friday, May 7, 2010

Michael Druker
Community Editorial Board


In the last half-century the Region of Waterloo has seen tremendous growth. We’ve built a university on farmland. Subdivisions upon subdivisions have sprung up at the outskirts of town.
Industry has been pushed out to “parks” accessible only by car.

We’ve put up office building wastelands and power centres galore. We’ve torn down parts of our downtowns to put up parking lots and inward-facing malls with blank walls facing the street. And
we’re still going strong, with plans to demolish industrial buildings in Kitchener’s warehouse district to turn it into a parking district.

At least we’ve decided to somewhat curtail the building of widely spaced houses on inaccessible crescents and cul-de-sacs, and new policies call for intensification and reurbanization. However, it
seems our thinking stops at a strange one-dimensional notion of density, one of condo towers, parking garages, and monster developments of all kinds.

Where are our lively new city streets? Where is our walkable city built for the street level? If we seem constitutionally incapable of building new urban space, one reason is that our planning policy makes it essentially impossible.

The late Jane Jacobs, renowned urban activist, wrote in The Death and Life of Great American Cities that, “There is a quality even meaner than outright ugliness or disorder, and this meaner quality
is the dishonest mask of pretended order, achieved by ignoring or suppressing the real order that is struggling to exist and to be served.”

Northdale is a rapidly growing area in Waterloo adjacent to Wilfrid Laurier University and near the University of Waterloo, Research In Motion and the Research and Technology Park. Growth of
the universities has resulted in a student residential monoculture there, with its attendant problems of overcrowded houses and rowdy students.

Waterloo city planners recently completed a report to allow city council to decide between the staff vision for Northdale and an alternative vision brought forward by community members unsatisfied
with the current approach. That current approach forces high-demand land in the interior of the neighbourhood to remain as low-density detached housing (to attract hypothetical families) and allows for only residential use without provision for neighbourhood amenities.

There is no liveliness save for keg parties, no public space and nothing to attract outsiders in. The corridors chosen for higher density are growing duller and drearier with every new student housing building added — either parking-oriented barracks or stucco towers.

The alternative is to allow and encourage the built form of our streets to become urban, and this requires considerable changes to zoning: removing minimum parking requirements, setting minimum densities, limiting heights to street-scale (e.g. six or eight storeys), and — most mportantly — permitting mixed uses. The city of Kitchener is implementing new mixed-use zoning, and Waterloo’s planners should take note.

For all the housing sprouting up in Northdale, there is no grocery store in sight. City planners require parking so that we can all drive to the mall, but in their infinite wisdom they do not see fit to allow streets where we might have reason or desire to walk. (The only exceptions are grandfathered in.)

Northdale is within walking distance of two universities, many major tech companies, busy transit corridors, future light rail, as well as uptown Waterloo. Currently it is prime land for students
without much choice, but it could easily also be attractive for students with choice, for university faculty and staff, and for RIM employees.

Add commerce and a few academic and office buildings to a diverse mix of housing, and you have a great alternative to more suburbs.

We should plan for neighbourhoods in which people enjoy living and enjoy walking — where we not only live, but also work, shop and play.

Neighbourhoods where we have welcoming streetscapes, good transit routes and service, shops on our way, usable public spaces, and a built environment that supports community instead of hindering it.

Northdale is a perfect opportunity to create new urban space.

Waterloo should set up more ‘urban space’ in the Northdale area

Michael Druker is a graduate student at the
University of Waterloo. He is a member of
the Tri-Cities Transport Action Group and
of Help Urbanize the Ghetto in Waterloo.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Opinion on Northdale - Frank Etherington

Kitchener and Waterloo councillors ignore neighbourhoods


Nurturing the health and vibrancy of urban neighbourhoods should always be a top priority for city councillors and planners.
But that didn’t seem to be the case in Kitchener and Waterloo this week as obsequious officials and councillors ignored interests of residents in two communities to placate a developer, avoid offending those running our universities and satisfy student-housing demands.
In the west end of Kitchener, it looks as though we’re preparing to bulldoze heritage buildings at Joseph and Victoria streets. The historic properties, part of the Lang Tannery development, are threatened with demolition to make way for yet another unnecessary surface parking lot.
Meanwhile, in Waterloo, officials who don’t want to ruffle academia feathers continue to look the other way and refuse to take meaningful action to address worsening problems created by a ghetto of rental, student housing that is destroying what used to be attractive Albert Street neighbourhoods.
It’s ironic that during a week where numerous events were held to honour the late urban activist Jane Jacobs, articles in this newspaper detailed troubling issues faced by the two Kitchener-Waterloo communities. Jacobs was a forceful defender of neighbourhoods and an outspoken critic of any urban renewal that put older buildings at risk.
I’ve written before about the disgraceful situation in Waterloo where besieged residents desperate for a little peace, quiet and quality living are being driven out of their homes by a minority of party-animal students who, based on their childish behaviour, should be sent back to kindergarten.
For years, little has been done about a situation where residents have tolerated drunken students vomiting and urinating on their property. They have watched their communities gutted by tacky rental-housing owned by irresponsible landlords while enduring rowdy parties and property damage.
Statistics show that between 2005 and 2008, police were called to Albert a staggering 2, 486 times. Many of those police responses — paid for by regional taxpayers — were to control student parties and babysit slobbering drunks. The complaints included 107 calls to report sick or injured people and 266 noise complaints.
Back in Kitchener, architect John MacDonald wants the city to stop Toronto-based developer, Cadan, from demolishing buildings to create additional parking in the warehouse district. He wants city officials to support the content of their own official plan which says heritage buildings should be preserved and surface parking lots discouraged.
MacDonald, who would rather see the heritage buildings used for galleries, restaurants or housing, says it’s unlikely public meetings will take place to debate the proposed demolitions because zoning on the tannery land already allows parking lots.
Cadan plans to eventually replace the surface lot with a multi-storey parking garage in a city that is already spending $70 million on other downtown parking complexes. The tannery proposal would negatively impact nearby homes the same way Joseph Street houses have already been degraded near Water Street South by another ugly parking garage.
Kitchener’s car-worshiping councillors and planners who just can’t get enough of those parking lots and care little about encouraging greater use of public transit will no doubt approve demolition of the tannery buildings in their ongoing scramble to justify millions of dollars they have spent on downtown revitalization.
A good example of this insatiable love of parking lots is the $15.5-million currently being spent to erect a 500-vehicle monstrosity at Charles and Benton streets where city council is squandering one of our most valuable piece of downtown real estate in order to build a multi-level parking eyesore.
For the sake of future generations, Kitchener-Waterloo councillors should make more effort to protect their neighbourhoods instead of kowtowing to the demands of developers, businesses and universities.
Kitchener journalist Frank Etherington writes on alternate Thursdays. He welcomes comments at fetherington@sympatico.ca

Albert Street - what does this mess cost the city?

http://news.therecord.com/News/Local/article/704874

Trapped on Albert: ‘This street is an embarrassment to the city’


WATERLOO — A young woman in a short, tight dress teeters on high heels on the sidewalk. She turns to the street, pulls at her top, and exposes a breast to the passing traffic. A young man next to her pretends to stroke himself.

A giddy crowd surrounds them on the lawn of a student-rented house. Someone holds up a sign that says: “You Honk We Drink.” It’s early morning and the party already seems wild.

“That’s what’s wrong with Albert Street,” Deborah Easson sighs.

Albert Street is ground zero for university students behaving badly. Two permanent residents say they have endured all they can take.

“Behaviour has changed to something you can’t really appreciate unless you live here. It’s kind of a shock,” says Easson. “We are so marginalized at this point, we are the outsiders.”

Police records support her contention of a street under stress.

Between Nov. 18, 2005 and Nov. 17, 2008, Waterloo Regional Police were contacted about 2,486 incidents on Albert Street that were not 911 emergencies, according to an analysis by The Record. This averages more than two calls to police per day.

Some commercial streets were busier. But no other residential street in Waterloo generated as many non-emergency calls to police, according to records released under a freedom-of-information request.

Activities on Albert drew 266 noise complaints, the most for any street in Waterloo Region.

Residents called police 171 times for unknown reasons and 128 times to complain about illegal parking. They contacted police 107 times to report someone sick or injured. Other leading calls were to report traffic collisions, property damage, thefts, break-and-enters and disturbances.

Albert Street also generated 911 calls but the records released on emergencies are incomplete. On average, 911 calls account for only six per cent of calls to police.

Albert Street runs through student-dominated neighbourhoods where up to 72 per cent of dwellings are rented out. The street has 73 lodging houses, each licensed for four or more tenants. It passes by Wilfrid Laurier University, near the University of Waterloo.

Some students who reside on Albert admit they like to party. They can see how this might bother some neighbours. But they also resent armed police and unarmed bylaw officers showing up regularly at their doors and wonder: Shouldn’t neighbours expect parties on a student street?

“It’s not like we do it every single night,” says Pat McDonald, a recent Laurier graduate.

“We aren’t rude to neighbours. We keep the property clean. We throw a party here or there but who doesn’t?” Laurier student Tom Biec says.

Police records suggest a strong link between Albert Street stresses and the student lifestyle.

In September, when university students return to classes, calls to police peak to more than three per day, on average. Calls fall off by almost half when students are away in July and August.

Calls to police fall in December when many students go home for Christmas. But complaints spike again in March. Residents blame student parties that launch around St. Patrick’s Day.

On St. Patrick’s Day this year, police laid 70 liquor charges in campus neighbourhoods, arrested one person for public intoxication, and issued three noise fines. Waterloo bylaw officers issued seven tickets and visited 13 student houses, asking residents to clean up debris and broken bottles.

Friday, March 17, 2006. Waterloo Regional Police take their first complaint from Albert Street before 2:30 a.m. when someone reports an unwanted person. Another call comes in just after 4 a.m. to report property damage.

As St. Patrick’s Day unfolds, police are called seven more times. There’s a reported automobile collision, a complaint about illegal parking and a call about a bad driver. The first noise complaint arrives just before midnight. Police respond by 1 a.m. and spend 11 minutes at the scene sorting it out.

Residents call police four more times on Saturday, March 18. Someone is reported sick or injured at 1:36 a.m. There’s a hit-and-run called in just before 4 a.m. The second noise complaint of the weekend arrives at 10:22 p.m. Minutes later, police take a complaint about a disturbance.

A third noise complaint arrives at 12:26 a.m. Sunday, March 19. Police respond at 12:44 a.m. and stay 46 minutes at the scene. In the early afternoon, police are called to help someone who’s sick or injured. The weekend concludes with 15 incidents reported over three days.

Easson was raised in the house she now owns near Columbia Street. She remembers that families often boarded students, who brought energy to Albert Street.

But today, students rent out entire houses. The balance and diversity is gone. “They roam the neighbourhood in groups, drinking and throwing up on our lawns,” Easson says.

Sidewalks are littered with glass from broken bottles, she says. Passersby urinate on lawns and in backyards. They shout at night and wake people up. A student neighbour has yelled at Easson for complaining to police.

Tenants park on lawns and party in front yards. They light fireworks and bonfires in backyards, sometimes trashing fences for wood. This winter, students built and displayed an explicit snow sculpture of a naked, headless female body, legs splayed open. Student leaders and police asked tenants to demolish it after it sparked complaints.

“It’s just disgusting, vulgar behaviour,” says Christine Carmody, who’s raising two sons, aged five and two, in a charming house near University Avenue. “Unless they put a police officer outside my house 24 hours a day, my peace will be disturbed. It is impossible to stop the noise.”

Carmody cites many disruptions. Someone hurled a 12-kilogram cable box through her window. A strange man refused to stay away from her backyard, even after she yelled at him. Student neighbours held a pool party so noisy she later went over and read them the riot act. An intoxicated youth drank beer in her driveway, kicked at her garage door and then went into her backyard, while 400 people partied at the student house next door.

“We know it’s a tough situation,” Waterloo Mayor Brenda Halloran says. Last fall, she watched police bust up a giant, out-of-control party at the student house next door to Carmody.

Some students see tensions differently. Ten students who live next door to Carmody resent being stuck with five $300 noise tickets last fall, within two months.

They admit they can be loud. They even called police on themselves last Halloween, to help break up a giant party. Yet they also feel unfairly targeted and wonder if a way can be found to allow parties without the risk of costly fines.

“I’m feeling there’s a way there could be a middle ground,” Pat McDonald says. He wonders if neighbours and authorities could support eight party exemptions a year, for events like Homecoming and St. Patrick’s.

It bothers University of Waterloo student John Bagby that residents complain regularly about student behaviour, while universities generate huge economic benefits for the community. “They want all the benefits, but they don’t want the inconveniences of having students,” he said.

Some students would like to see residents talk more often to student neighbours before calling authorities on them.

“The permanent residents who were here before us should have to have some level of tolerance,” says Mike Oudyk, of Laurier.

“It’s not that students are not willing to talk,” says Laurier student Tim Elphick, who advises Halloran on student issues. “It’s just that you can’t start out of the gate by attacking the other player.”

Student leaders, police and politicians contend only a minority of students cause problems. Public education is part of the solution, they say.

“The university doesn’t do the best job, once you leave residence, educating (students about) what it’s like to live off-campus,” says Laurier student Jackie Dobson, who helps direct student government. “It’s one of those things that you don’t really know the rules until they’re broken.”

Dobson learned the hard way last year how things can get out of hand, when her off-campus house was slapped with a noise ticket she admits it deserved.

David McMurray, Laurier’s dean of students, cites several education campaigns aimed at persuading students to act responsibly. “I think the university’s doing its job,” McMurray said. “We don’t have any jurisdiction, legally, outside of our own boundaries.”

Waterloo Regional Police lead an off-campus crackdown called Safe Semester every September, to encourage proper conduct. Over three years it has resulted in more than 1,940 charges for criminal and bylaw offences.

“We need project Safe Semester practically all year if they’re going to maintain the peace here,” Carmody says.

Police don’t have the resources to do that, Insp. Dave Gerencser says.

Gerencser said a team of five officers pays special attention to student neighbourhoods, working with residents, student leaders, universities and city bylaw officers. They aim for a balance where students can have fun without bothering neighbours or putting themselves at risk.

“The last thing we want to do is quell a young student’s memories of university by not having them enjoy their university life,” Chief Matt Torigian said.

However, Torigian is not keen on a proposal to allow the City of Waterloo to purchase extra policing for student neighbourhoods. He worries, in part, that this would be unfair to other neighbourhoods that can’t afford to buy extra policing.

Police also want bylaw officers to handle more noise complaints. “If there’s a need, we do go,” Torigian said. “But we’re certainly not going all the time.”

Carmody figures police “do the absolutely best possible job they could do.”

But Carmody and Easson are outspoken critics of city hall. They accuse Waterloo council of failing to stabilize streets plagued by poor landlords and faltering property standards, of failing to crack down on bad behaviour and of failing to enforce planning rules intended to preserve family homes.

Halloran defends city bylaw officers, saying they handle complaints from Albert Street as best they can. “We have limited staff,” she said.

Friday, Feb. 5, 2010. Easson is drawn from her bed by yelling outside on Albert Street. Is there a fight, she wonders? She looks out the window to see young men running down the street.

More noise wakes her a few hours later. Saturday morning, she finds tracks in the snow showing that two people walked deep into a neighbour’s backyard from the street, likely to urinate.

Saturday night there’s more screaming and yelling. Easson is awakened three times, after midnight, shortly after 1:30 a.m. and again after 3 a.m. It adds up to five late-night disturbances over one weekend. She never calls police.

Many permanent residents have fled Albert Street. Carmody would too, if she could sell her house for the price she wants. Last year she had it on the market for four months and cleaned it three times a week.

But families are now scared by Albert Street, she says. The only interest in her five-bedroom home came from landlords who want to fill it with students. However, city hall refuses to license her house for more than three tenants, because council wants to preserve it for permanent residents. This diminishes its value to landlords.

“I would give anything not to live here,” she says. “Except for I can’t lose my life savings.”

A planning overhaul could point the way forward.

Easson and Carmody have joined with others to press Waterloo council to stop trying to preserve suburban-style homes in Northdale, the troubled neighbourhood north of the Laurier campus. They want council to help replace decaying houses with residential complexes that can be better managed and maintained.

“You could end the partying in Albert Street by eliminating big backyards, the big houses and the big front yards,” Carmody says.

Both universities have proposed working with city government and developers to replace some suburban houses with high-quality student housing. “The universities’ role would be to become involved in the management and supervision of those facilities,” Laurier’s McMurray said.

Halloran can see upsides, but wonders if aging water and sewer pipes can support the extra residents. A community-wide debate is expected to launch in June, based on a city planning report.

Easson says Albert Street should be a jewel, as it is located near two campuses, the downtown, and high-tech jobs. But that’s not what she sees, as students steadily take over the homes.

“This street is an embarrassment to the city,” she says.

jouthit@therecord.com